Name | Popularity | Type | |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Microtransit (Scooter and Ebike) Trips
Microtransit (Scooter and Ebike) Trips
Transportation
scooter, ebike, scooters, ride, bird, bikewalk kc, ...
Dateset refreshes weekly!
This dataset contains historical microtransit trips in Kansas City, Missouri on micro-transit devices. The dataset has been processed to protect anonymity by rounding the start and end points (latitudes and longitudes) to just three decimal places - creating a grid effect. The individual path of each trip is not published to protect privacy, just the beginning and end points of each trip. Additionally, the scooter vendor name is not included in this dataset to protect proprietary information from the participating companies.
This is the same processing method used by the City of Louisville, KY for publishing their MDS data.
To learn more about MDS visit https://github.com/openmobilityfoundation/mobility-data-specification. |
3,644 views |
![]() |
![]() |
Percent of Bridges in Good or Better Condition
Percent of Bridges in Good or Better Condition
Transportation
bridge, road, street, street light, ...
This data set contains asset ratings for the City's Roads, Bridges, and Street Lighting systems. This data is Citywide, and not granular to a specific piece of infrastructure. This is the same information that is reported to the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB).
Public Works has established a program to evaluate the condition of all pavements. The name of the program is the Street Distress Rating System (SDRS). This program rates all segments of pavement over a three year period. The program measures actual physical defects in the pavement system which can be observed and quantified through visual inspection of the roadway surface. Broad categories include cracking, patching, depression, and surface wear. The system calculates the Pavement Condition Index representing a value ranging from "0" to "100". The department's intent is to achieve and retain a system-wide average value of not less than "60". The value below 80 represents a system that needs repairs, and improvements. A rating of "90" to "100" would show an excellent condition, "80" to "89" good condition, "70" to "79" fair condition, and below "70", poor condition.
The condition of bridges is measured using the Federal Highway Administration Rating System. The Federal system uses a measurement scale that is based on a condition index ranging from zero for a failed bridge to 100 for a bridge in perfect condition. The condition index is used to classify bridges and culverts in good or better condition (65 and 75 on up, respectively), fair condition (45 to 65) and substandard condition (less than 45). It is the City’s policy to maintain, on average, at least 75 percent of its bridge system at a good or better condition level. No more than 10 percent should be in the substandard condition. Condition assessments are determined every other year. All bridges are rated at least once every two years.
The condition of street lighting is measured using a system designed by the City. The system uses a measurement scale that is based on an assigned condition index to a streetlight of zero for failing or 100 for passing each measured factor and measures 16 different factors. The condition index is used to classify street lighting in better condition ( 90 and up), good condition ( 80 to 89) and substandard condition (less than 80). It is the City’s policy to maintain an overall average of at least 90 percent condition rating (better condition rating) for the entire street light system. No more than 10 percent of the entire street lighting system should be below the better condition rating. Condition assessments are determined every year. Street lights are selected for condition assessments systematically by private contractor hired to assess and immediately repair all street lights inspected. The plan is to have 100 percent of all street lights inspected, with corresponding repairs, every two years. |
646 views |
![]() |
![]() |
373 views |
![]() |
|
![]() |
693 views |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Citizen Satisfaction with Bike Infrastructure FY2016
Citizen Satisfaction with Bike Infrastructure FY2016
Transportation
bike, bicycle, biking, cycling, cycle, ...
This is from the midyear 2014 citizen satisfaction survey which asks citizens how satisfied they are with on street bike infrastructure. There were 1654 responses to this question. Don't knows are not included in the respondent count or chart. There were 319 respondents who did chose not to answer this question. |
394 views |
![]() |
![]() |
Street Plate Permit Report
Street Plate Permit Report
Transportation
street plates, street plate permits, open permits, ...
|
637 views |
![]() |
![]() |
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Curb Ramps Overview
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Curb Ramps Overview
Transportation
ada, americans with disabilities, ...
|
634 views |
![]() |
![]() |
Road, Bridge, and Street Lighting Overall Condition
Road, Bridge, and Street Lighting Overall Condition
Transportation
bridge, road, street, street light, ...
This data set contains asset ratings for the City's Roads, Bridges, and Street Lighting systems. This data is Citywide, and not granular to a specific piece of infrastructure. This is the same information that is reported to the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB).
Public Works has established a program to evaluate the condition of all pavements. The name of the program is the Street Distress Rating System (SDRS). This program rates all segments of pavement over a three year period. The program measures actual physical defects in the pavement system which can be observed and quantified through visual inspection of the roadway surface. Broad categories include cracking, patching, depression, and surface wear. The system calculates the Pavement Condition Index representing a value ranging from "0" to "100". The department's intent is to achieve and retain a system-wide average value of not less than "60". The value below 80 represents a system that needs repairs, and improvements. A rating of "90" to "100" would show an excellent condition, "80" to "89" good condition, "70" to "79" fair condition, and below "70", poor condition.
The condition of bridges is measured using the Federal Highway Administration Rating System. The Federal system uses a measurement scale that is based on a condition index ranging from zero for a failed bridge to 100 for a bridge in perfect condition. The condition index is used to classify bridges and culverts in good or better condition (65 and 75 on up, respectively), fair condition (45 to 65) and substandard condition (less than 45). It is the City’s policy to maintain, on average, at least 75 percent of its bridge system at a good or better condition level. No more than 10 percent should be in the substandard condition. Condition assessments are determined every other year. All bridges are rated at least once every two years.
The condition of street lighting is measured using a system designed by the City. The system uses a measurement scale that is based on an assigned condition index to a streetlight of zero for failing or 100 for passing each measured factor and measures 16 different factors. The condition index is used to classify street lighting in better condition ( 90 and up), good condition ( 80 to 89) and substandard condition (less than 80). It is the City’s policy to maintain an overall average of at least 90 percent condition rating (better condition rating) for the entire street light system. No more than 10 percent of the entire street lighting system should be below the better condition rating. Condition assessments are determined every year. Street lights are selected for condition assessments systematically by private contractor hired to assess and immediately repair all street lights inspected. The plan is to have 100 percent of all street lights inspected, with corresponding repairs, every two years. |
956 views |
![]() |
![]() |
Citizen Satisfaction with Bike Infrastructure - Bar Chart
Citizen Satisfaction with Bike Infrastructure - Bar Chart
Transportation
bike, bicycle, biking, cycling, cycle, ...
This is from the midyear 2014 citizen satisfaction survey which asks citizens how satisfied they are with on street bike infrastructure. There were 1654 responses to this question. Don't knows are not included in the respondent count or chart. There were 319 respondents who did chose not to answer this question. |
652 views |
![]() |
![]() |
Satisfaction With Bike Infrastructure
Satisfaction With Bike Infrastructure
Transportation
bike, bicycle, biking, cycling, cycle, ...
This is from the midyear 2014 citizen satisfaction survey which asks citizens how satisfied they are with on street bike infrastructure. There were 1654 responses to this question. Don't knows are not included in the respondent count or chart. There were 319 respondents who did chose not to answer this question. |
377 views |
![]() |