3 Results
filtered by...
Filter
Tags > street rating
Sort
Sort by Most Relevant
Filter
3 Results
filtered by
Tags > street rating
Clear All
This data set contains asset ratings for the City's Roads, Bridges, and Street Lighting systems. This data is Citywide, and not granular to a specific piece of infrastructure. This is the same information that is reported to the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB).
Public Works has established a program to evaluate the condition of all pavements. The name of the program is the Street Distress Rating System (SDRS). This program rates all segments of pavement over a three year period. The program measures actual physical defects in the pavement system which can be observed and quantified through visual inspection of the roadway surface. Broad categories include cracking, patching, depression, and surface wear. The system calculates the Pavement Condition Index representing a value ranging from "0" to "100". The department's intent is to achieve and retain a system-wide average value of not less than "60". The value below 80 represents a system that needs repairs, and improvements. A rating of "90" to "100" would show an excellent condition, "80" to "89" good condition, "70" to "79" fair condition, and below "70", poor condition.
The condition of bridges is measured using the Federal Highway Administration Rating System. The Federal system uses a measurement scale that is based on a condition index ranging from zero for a failed bridge to 100 for a bridge in perfect condition. The condition index is used to classify bridges and culverts in good or better condition (65 and 75 on up, respectively), fair condition (45 to 65) and substandard condition (less than 45). It is the City’s policy to maintain, on average, at least 75 percent of its bridge system at a good or better condition level. No more than 10 percent should be in the substandard condition. Condition assessments are determined every other year. All bridges are rated at least once every two years.
The condition of street lighting is measured using a system designed by the City. The system uses a measurement scale that is based on an assigned condition index to a streetlight of zero for failing or 100 for passing each measured factor and measures 16 different factors. The condition index is used to classify street lighting in better condition ( 90 and up), good condition ( 80 to 89) and substandard condition (less than 80). It is the City’s policy to maintain an overall average of at least 90 percent condition rating (better condition rating) for the entire street light system. No more than 10 percent of the entire street lighting system should be below the better condition rating. Condition assessments are determined every year. Street lights are selected for condition assessments systematically by private contractor hired to assess and immediately repair all street lights inspected. The plan is to have 100 percent of all street lights inspected, with corresponding repairs, every two years.
Updated
December 31 2020
Views
481
This data set contains asset ratings for the City's Roads, Bridges, and Street Lighting systems. This data is Citywide, and not granular to a specific piece of infrastructure. This is the same information that is reported to the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB).
Public Works has established a program to evaluate the condition of all pavements. The name of the program is the Street Distress Rating System (SDRS). This program rates all segments of pavement over a three year period. The program measures actual physical defects in the pavement system which can be observed and quantified through visual inspection of the roadway surface. Broad categories include cracking, patching, depression, and surface wear. The system calculates the Pavement Condition Index representing a value ranging from "0" to "100". The department's intent is to achieve and retain a system-wide average value of not less than "60". The value below 80 represents a system that needs repairs, and improvements. A rating of "90" to "100" would show an excellent condition, "80" to "89" good condition, "70" to "79" fair condition, and below "70", poor condition.
The condition of bridges is measured using the Federal Highway Administration Rating System. The Federal system uses a measurement scale that is based on a condition index ranging from zero for a failed bridge to 100 for a bridge in perfect condition. The condition index is used to classify bridges and culverts in good or better condition (65 and 75 on up, respectively), fair condition (45 to 65) and substandard condition (less than 45). It is the City’s policy to maintain, on average, at least 75 percent of its bridge system at a good or better condition level. No more than 10 percent should be in the substandard condition. Condition assessments are determined every other year. All bridges are rated at least once every two years.
The condition of street lighting is measured using a system designed by the City. The system uses a measurement scale that is based on an assigned condition index to a streetlight of zero for failing or 100 for passing each measured factor and measures 16 different factors. The condition index is used to classify street lighting in better condition ( 90 and up), good condition ( 80 to 89) and substandard condition (less than 80). It is the City’s policy to maintain an overall average of at least 90 percent condition rating (better condition rating) for the entire street light system. No more than 10 percent of the entire street lighting system should be below the better condition rating. Condition assessments are determined every year. Street lights are selected for condition assessments systematically by private contractor hired to assess and immediately repair all street lights inspected. The plan is to have 100 percent of all street lights inspected, with corresponding repairs, every two years.
Updated
December 31 2020
Views
200
This data set contains asset ratings for the City's Roads, Bridges, and Street Lighting systems. This data is Citywide, and not granular to a specific piece of infrastructure. This is the same information that is reported to the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB).
Public Works has established a program to evaluate the condition of all pavements. The name of the program is the Street Distress Rating System (SDRS). This program rates all segments of pavement over a three year period. The program measures actual physical defects in the pavement system which can be observed and quantified through visual inspection of the roadway surface. Broad categories include cracking, patching, depression, and surface wear. The system calculates the Pavement Condition Index representing a value ranging from "0" to "100". The department's intent is to achieve and retain a system-wide average value of not less than "60". The value below 80 represents a system that needs repairs, and improvements. A rating of "90" to "100" would show an excellent condition, "80" to "89" good condition, "70" to "79" fair condition, and below "70", poor condition.
The condition of bridges is measured using the Federal Highway Administration Rating System. The Federal system uses a measurement scale that is based on a condition index ranging from zero for a failed bridge to 100 for a bridge in perfect condition. The condition index is used to classify bridges and culverts in good or better condition (65 and 75 on up, respectively), fair condition (45 to 65) and substandard condition (less than 45). It is the City’s policy to maintain, on average, at least 75 percent of its bridge system at a good or better condition level. No more than 10 percent should be in the substandard condition. Condition assessments are determined every other year. All bridges are rated at least once every two years.
The condition of street lighting is measured using a system designed by the City. The system uses a measurement scale that is based on an assigned condition index to a streetlight of zero for failing or 100 for passing each measured factor and measures 16 different factors. The condition index is used to classify street lighting in better condition ( 90 and up), good condition ( 80 to 89) and substandard condition (less than 80). It is the City’s policy to maintain an overall average of at least 90 percent condition rating (better condition rating) for the entire street light system. No more than 10 percent of the entire street lighting system should be below the better condition rating. Condition assessments are determined every year. Street lights are selected for condition assessments systematically by private contractor hired to assess and immediately repair all street lights inspected. The plan is to have 100 percent of all street lights inspected, with corresponding repairs, every two years.
Updated
August 5 2020
Views
216
Showing 1 to 3 of 3 results
Categories
A-Z
Tags
A-Z
- 1/8 (2)
- 10 million (4)
- 16-17 (1)
- 17 (1)
- 19-20 (4)
- 20 (2)
- 2010 (2)
- 2012 (2)
- 2012-2020 (1)
- 2013 (7)
- 2014 (5)
- 2015 (3)
- 2016 (4)
- 2016-17 (1)
- 2016-2017 (1)
- 2017 (2)
- 2017 budget (1)
- 2017-18 budget (1)
- 2018 (2)
- 2018-19 budget (1)
- 2019 (2)
- 2019-20 (1)
- 2019-2020 (2)
- 2020 (5)
- 311 (615)
- 311 average (1)
- 311 quality of service (2)
- 311 stats (17)
- 311 stats v3 (7)
- 311 survey (8)
- 311 survey scores (1)
- 311 type (17)
- 353 (1)
- abatement (1)
- abduction (5)
- acs (5)
- action center (7)
- action center survey data (7)
- actual (2)
- actuals (3)
- ada (3)
- address (3)
- addresses (3)
- adopt a lot (2)
- adopt a neighborhood (1)
- adopt-a-lot (3)
- adopt-a-neighborhood (3)
- adopted (7)
- adopted budget (6)
- adopted budget fy2014 (2)
- aed (2)
- age (29)
- ages (1)
- air quality (9)
- alarms (3)
- americans with disabilities (3)
- americans with disabilities act (3)
- analytics (3)
- application (1)
- appropriation (2)
- appropriation unit (2)
- arson (5)
- asbestos (9)
- assault (5)
- assessed value (1)
- assets (1)
- assistance programs (2)
- associations (1)
- auction (4)
- average life (1)
- average score (1)
- awards (5)
- bars (7)
- bdkc (592)
- benchmarking (2)
- benefits (14)
- bicycle (6)
- bidding (3)
- bike (7)
- bike infrastructure (4)
- bike lane (4)
- bike sharrow (4)
- bike walk (1)
- bikekc (1)
- bikewalk (1)
- bikewalk kc (1)
- bikewalkkc (1)
- biking (6)
- bins (1)
- bird (1)
- bizcare (5)
- bizsat (2)
- blackmail (5)
- blds (2)
- bond rating (2)
- border (4)
- boulevard (1)
- boulevards (1)
- boundaries (4)
- boundary (14)
- breaking (5)
- bribery (5)
- bridge (3)
- bridge rating (3)
- budget (37)
- budget 17 (1)
- budget appropriation (2)
- budget appropriation unit (2)
- budget.kcmo.gov (2)
- building (1)
- building permits (19)
- buildings (23)
- burglary (5)
- bus (8)
- bus stops (6)
- business (17)
- business license (29)
- business plan (24)
- business satisfaction (2)
- business survey (2)
- buy (4)
- capita (1)
- capital (1)
- capital improvements (6)
- capital spending (1)
- car (6)
- carpool (2)
- case (1)
- case clearance (1)
- case clearance rate (1)
- cass (4)
- census (16)
- cha (1)
- check cashing (7)
- checkbook (19)
- cid (1)
- cit sat (2)
- citation (2)
- citations (2)
- citizen (4)
- citizen satisfaction (29)
- citsat (25)
- city (7)
- city contracts (2)
- city hall (1)
- city planning (1)
- clay (2)
- clearance (1)
- clearance rate (1)
- clients (2)
- climate protection (4)
- cluster model (1)
- code (27)
- code violations (27)
- codes (6)
- college (1)
- community (8)
- community ghg inventory (6)
- community health (3)
- community health assessment (1)
- commute (2)
- commuting (4)
- compliance (4)
- condemnation (3)
- condemned (3)
- condition (1)
- construction (18)
- contractor (1)
- contracts (5)
- control (1)
- cost (17)
- council districts (2)
- counterfeiting (5)
- counts (2)
- county (9)
- court (1)
- covid19 (6)
- cpd (1)
- credit (2)
- credit rating (2)
- creek (1)
- crime (128)
- crime 2015 (1)
- crime 2016 (8)
- crime 2017 (4)
- crime data (24)
- crime data 2015 (1)
- crime data 2016 (8)
- crime data 2017 (5)
- crime data 2018 (4)
- crime data 2019 (4)
- crime data 2020 (1)
- crime data 2021 (1)
- crime statistics (5)
- crime summary (5)
- criminal (5)
- crosswalk ramps (3)
- cultural asset inventory (2)
- cultural assets (2)
- curb (3)
- curb ramps (3)
- curbs (3)
- cycle (4)
- cycling (4)
- dangerous (3)
- dangerous buildings (32)
- dangerous buildings demolitions (3)
- data (8)
- data analytics (2)
- data inventory (1)
- datasets (1)
- db (6)
- db demo (3)
- death (7)
- defibrillator (1)
- demo (3)
- demographic (8)
- demographics (8)
- demolition (32)
- demolitions (24)
- department analysis (1)
- developer (11)
- development projects (3)
- diversion (1)
- diversion rate (1)
- drug (5)
- dumping (3)
- dwellings (1)
- earnings (1)
- earnings tax (17)
- east side sales tax (2)
- east-side (2)
- east-side sales tax (2)
- ebike (1)
- ebikes (1)
- economic development (11)
- edc (2)
- education (26)
- eigth (2)
- election (1)
- elections (1)
- embezzlement (5)
- emergency (3)
- employee survey data (1)
- employees (2)
- employment (4)
- ems (1)
- energy (17)
- energy benchmarking (4)
- energy conservation (3)
- energy efficiency (4)
- energy empowerment ordinance (4)
- energy star (7)
- enterprise zones (1)
- environment (6)
- environmental health (10)
- environmental quality (2)
- establishments (2)
- ethnicity (25)
- events (2)
- evictions (1)
- expenditure (1)
- expenditures (16)
- expenditures by category (14)
- extortion (5)
- family (2)
- fee (14)
- fee revenue (14)
- fema (1)
- finance (36)
- finance and governance (14)
- finances (14)
- financial (14)
- financial trends (14)
- financial trends monitoring system (14)
- fire (2)
- fiscal (1)
- fiscal year (2)
- fleet (3)
- flood (4)
- flood plain (1)
- flooding (1)
- floodplain (1)
- food (5)
- food permits (18)
- forcible (5)
- forecast (4)
- forgery (5)
- fraud (5)
- frequency (2)
- fringe (14)
- ftms (14)
- fuel types (3)
- full employment council (2)
- funding source (6)
- fy (1)
- fy 17 (1)
- fy 2016-17 line item budget (1)
- fy 2016-2017 (1)
- fy 2017 (1)
- fy 2020-21 (2)
- fy 21 (1)
- fy15 (2)
- fy16 (1)
- fy16-17 (1)
- fy17 (1)
- fy19 (1)
- fy2014-15 (2)
- fy2014-2015 (2)
- fy2015 (2)
- fy2015-16 (1)
- fy2015-2016 (1)
- fy2016-17 (1)
- fy2016-2016 (1)
- fy2016-2017 (1)
- fy2017 (1)
- fy21 (1)
- gambling (5)
- garages (2)
- gardens (8)
- gender (1)
- genders (1)
- geocode (3)
- geocoded (3)
- gis (3)
- goals (24)
- goals and objectives (24)
- google (2)
- google analytics (5)
- governance (14)
- government operations (2)
- govstat (24)
- green (6)
- greenhouse gas (4)
- greenhouse gas emissions (12)
- group quarters (18)
- grouped (1)
- health (3)
- health assessment (1)
- health department (4)
- heart disease (3)
- high school (1)
- high value (244)
- hispanic (25)
- historic (1)
- historic properties (1)
- historical data (14)
- hits (5)
- home (1)
- home repair (1)
- homes (1)
- homicide (15)
- hotel rooms (9)
- house (2)
- household (3)
- households (26)
- housing (27)
- housing units (11)
- human resources (1)
- i&i (3)
- illegal dumping (3)
- improvement (1)
- income (24)
- index (2)
- industry (15)
- infiltration (1)
- inflation (14)
- inflow (1)
- inflow and infiltration (2)
- innovation (1)
- inspections (23)
- inventory (1)
- iv (2)
- jackson (1)
- jackson county (1)
- job specifications (1)
- jobs (1)
- justine petersen (2)
- kansas (7)
- kansas city (12)
- kansas city crime data (2)
- kc (12)
- kc bizcare (1)
- kcfd (1)
- kcmo (14)
- kcmo city contracts (2)
- kcmo.gov (3)
- kcmops311 (244)
- kcpd (5)
- kcsourcelink (2)
- kcstat (38)
- kidnapping (5)
- labor force (23)
- land bank (23)
- land trust (24)
- land use (1)
- land use codes (1)
- land use description (1)
- language (1)
- languages (1)
- larceny (5)
- large buildings (7)
- latitude (3)
- lcra (1)
- lead (3)
- lead removal (2)
- leadsafe (2)
- learning (1)
- leed (3)
- life (1)
- life expectancy (1)
- line item (25)
- line item budget (1)
- liquor (7)
- list (1)
- litter (5)
- litter index (2)
- littering (3)
- live (1)
- location (1)
- log (1)
- longitude (3)
- lots (1)
- map (1)
- maps (4)
- market (1)
- market value (1)
- market value analysis (1)
- master inventory (1)
- mds (1)
- micro-mobility (1)
- micromobility (1)
- miles completed (3)
- miles replaced (3)
- miss (1)
- missed (1)
- missed trash (1)
- missouri (7)
- missouri zip (2)
- mo (8)
- mobility data specification (1)
- money (15)
- monthly (4)
- monthy (1)
- motor vehicle theft (5)
- mowing (1)
- municipal court (3)
- municourt (3)
- mva (1)
- naics codes (2)
- narcotic (5)
- national register (1)
- neighborhood (31)
- neighborhood clean (3)
- neighborhood clean ups (3)
- neighborhood cleanups (3)
- neighborhood pop (1)
- neighborhood population (1)
- neighborhoods (8)
- new (1)
- nibers (5)
- nibrs (6)
- nid (1)
- nuisance (1)
- nuisances (1)
- number of people (1)
- number of residents (1)
- objectives (24)
- obscene materials (5)
- occupation (16)
- occupations (1)
- ocp (1)
- offenses (5)
- one eigth (2)
- one-eigth (2)
- opeb (14)
- open (2)
- open budget (2)
- open data (1)
- open performance (25)
- open permits (1)
- openperformance (24)
- opportunities (3)
- ordinances (3)
- overcrowded (15)
- overflow (1)
- owners (2)
- ownership (25)
- page views (5)
- pageviews (3)
- parcels (1)
- park (1)
- parking (2)
- parks (1)
- patrol divisions (1)
- pave (1)
- paving (1)
- payments (19)
- pci (1)
- pension (14)
- per capita (14)
- performance (1)
- permit (1)
- permits (25)
- piac (1)
- piea (2)
- platte (1)
- police (5)
- police data (19)
- police datac (5)
- polling (1)
- polling places (1)
- pop (1)
- population (33)
- pornography (5)
- post employment benefits (14)
- pot hole (1)
- pot-hole (1)
- pothole (1)
- potholes (1)
- potthole (1)
- poverty (23)
- precinct (1)
- precincts (1)
- procurement services (3)
- program (1)
- project (1)
- projects (1)
- property (70)
- property tax (14)
- property taxes (1)
- property value (1)
- property violations (33)
- prostitution (5)
- public access defibrillation (1)
- public safety (14)
- public safety expenditures (14)
- public works (2)
- race (31)
- racial (6)
- rainfall (1)
- rating (2)
- ratings (1)